Laureen
Queen Instructor
Staff member
Administrator
Moderator
Blitzer
PBC Student (CPC®)
CCO Club Member
CCO Support Staff
MTA Student
ICD-10-CM Student
PPM Student (CPPM®)
FBC Student (CPC-H®)
I've been getting a lot of questions about modifier 59 changes going into effect January 1st 2015 for CMS.
First here are some resources:
Key Take Aways:
First here are some resources:
- Transmittal 1422 - CMS Manual Pub 100-20 - One Time Notification - where it all began
- MLN Matters® Number: MM8863
- Modifier 59 Article by CMS - gives insight into the history of 59 with CMS and why they felt the need to introduce the new X modifiers
- Article by JoAnne Sheehan, CPC, CPPM, CPC-I, CCO Instructor
- AAPC Article
- 2005 Article from the OIG - shows they've been having their eye on this for some time
Key Take Aways:
citationThe primary issue associated with the -59 modifier is that it is defined for use in a wide variety of
circumstances, such as a use to identify different encounters, different anatomic sites, and distinct services.
Usage to identify a separate encounter is infrequent and usually correct; usage to define a separate anatomic
site is less common and problematic; usage to define a distinct service is common and not infrequently
overrides the edit in the exact circumstance for which CMS created the edit in the first place. CMS believes
that more precise coding options coupled with increased education and selective editing is needed to reduce
the errors associated with this overpayment.
citationCMS will continue to recognize the -59 modifier, but notes that Current Procedural
Terminology (CPT) instructions state that the -59 modifier should not be used when a more
descriptive modifier is available. While CMS will continue to recognize the -59 modifier in
many instances, it may selectively require a more specific - X{EPSU} modifier for billing
certain codes at high risk for incorrect billing. For example, a particular NCCI PTP code
pair may be identified as payable only with the -XE separate encounter modifier but not the
-59 or other -X{EPSU} modifiers. The -X{EPSU} modifiers are more selective versions of
the -59 modifier so it would be incorrect to include both modifiers on the same line.